GeXcube Radeon 9600XT Extreme
Synthetic benchmarks:
3DMark 2003 v340
As we can see, "GeXcube Radeon 9600XT Extreme" was able to catch up with "NVIDIA FX5700 Ultra". Remember that it was attained through the departure of the "canonical standard" defined by ATI for video cards of XT series by merely 100 MHz of the memory frequency.
Here is a detailed view of results produced in 3DMark 2003 v340:
3DMark 2001SE
Let's run a test imagining there is no DX9 at all. Then we get the following. FX5700 Ultra and Radeon 9600XT Extreme start up very close to one another, but the "margin of safety" in NVIDIA produce is greater - the use of DDR2 memory makes itself felt.
Codecreatures
The small performance boost in the Extreme version is achieved, which is definitely not enough to compete with FX5700 Ultra.
Village Mark
This is a benchmark measuring the efficiency of invisible surfaces cut-off. The result for GeXcube and standard XT is the same, and the ATI RV360 does a better job coping with this task than the NV36.
Aquamark 3
This benchmark was created in close cooperation with NVIDIA. But to some reason it's just this benchmark that shows not the best with their video cards.
 |
Content: |
 |
|
|
Top Stories: |
|
 |
|
MoBo:
|
|
|
|
VGA Card:
|
|
|
|
CPU & Memory:
|
|
|
